Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | NR5668 11
Original file (NR5668 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100!
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TIR: 151
Docket No: 5668-11
2 April 2015

The Secretary of. the Navy has requested that I respond to your. —:
current request for reconsideration of your case. You previously

petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 29 March
2012, that your application had been denied.

Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously
examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence
that was not previously considered by the Board, your request
must again be denied. In accordance with the foregoing, your
application is hereby administratively closed. yo -

It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such

that the Board will not process any additional reviews, and this
Matter is considered a final action. However, if you wish to

continue to seek relief you will need to present your concerns to
a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4167 14

    Original file (NR4167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 4167-14 11203-0908 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request received on 20 February 2014. Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board, your request must again be denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4341 14

    Original file (NR4341 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 4341-14 2829-13 20 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request received on 25 February 2014. Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board, your request must again be denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12084 14

    Original file (NR12084 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. The Board heard your case on 29 March 2011 under docket number #13731-10 and denied your petition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11234-06

    Original file (11234-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 5 February 1982 for six years. However, the next two evaluations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR6702 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR6702 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 August 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08440-10

    Original file (08440-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code should not be changed due to your diagnosed visual condition which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10919-07

    Original file (10919-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 April 2006 at age 18. You have also provided a current psychiatric...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03731-08

    Original file (03731-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05011-01

    Original file (05011-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. notes, in part, as follows: However, the Board concluded these The instruction also paygrade To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in USN after serving on active duty as USNR), the member must be: (1) serving as a petty officer or,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06317-10

    Original file (06317-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...